人迎穴改良针刺提插法治疗椎动脉型颈椎病的疗效分析
作者:
作者单位:

1. 华中科技大学同济医学院附属武汉中心医院,湖北 武汉 430014;2. 湖北中医药大学针灸骨伤学院,湖北 武汉 430065

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R246.2

基金项目:

* 基金项目: 湖北省卫生计生委2013-2014年度中医药、中西医结合科研一般项目(2013Z-Y29) 收稿日期: 2016 - 08 - 06 作者简介: 马朝阳(1964-),男,湖北天门人,主任医师,硕士生导师,研究方向:针灸治疗心脑血管、神经系统疾病。


Clinical Effect Observation of Renying Modified Acupuncture Combined Lifting andThrusting Manipulation Treating Cervical Spondylosis of Vertebral Artery Type
Author:
Affiliation:

1. Tongji Medical College Huazhong University of Science and Technology the Cental Hospital of Wuhan, Wuhan 430014, China;2. School of Acupuncture and Fracture, Hubei University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 430065, China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
    摘要:

    目的〓观察常规针刺法、常规针刺提插法、改良针刺法、改良针刺提插法4种针治疗方法对椎动脉型颈椎病(CSA)的临床疗效。方法〓将120例确诊为CSA的患者随机分为4组,每组各30人。分别给予4种不同针刺治疗方法,第1组常规针刺人迎穴,第2组人迎穴常规针刺提插法,第3组人迎改良针刺方法,第4组给予人迎穴改良针刺提插法。各组均治疗2个疗程后,比较4组临床疗效及眩晕障碍评定量表(DHI)评分。结果〓①4组临床疗效比较中,1、2、3组比较无显著差异(P>0.0083),而此3组与第4组分别比较均有显著意义(P<0.0083);②治疗后4组DHI评分比较,改良针刺提插法与其它3组比较均有显著差异(P<0.0083)。结论〓人迎穴改良针刺提插法对CSA的疗效较好,尤其对眩晕症状有明显改善。

    Abstract:

    Objective To observe clinical effect on the methods of conventional acupuncture, conventional acupuncture combined lifting-thrusting, modified acupuncture and modified acupuncture combined lifting-thrusting in treating cervical spondylosis of vertebral artery type(CSA). Methods 120 CSA patients were randomly divided into four groups, each group of 30 patients. The four groups’ patients were given four different acupuncture treatment respectively, Group 1 given conventional Renying acupuncture method, Group 2 given conventional acupuncture combined lifting-thrusting manipulation method, Group 3 given modified acupuncture method, Group 4 given modified acupuncture combined lifting-thrusting manipulation method. After 4 groups experiencing 2 courses of treatment, compared clinical effect and the scores of Vertigo disorder rating scale(DHI)of those. Results ① In the comparision of the 4 groups’ clinical efficacy, there had no significant difference in Group 1, Group 2 and Group 3(P>0.0083), and significant difference of Group 4 comparing with the other three groups respectively(P<0.0083). ② Before treatment, comparing DHI scores of the 4 groups, showed significant difference between modified acupuncture combined lifting-thrusting manipulation and other three methods respectively(P<0.0083). Conclusion The treatment of Renying modified acupuncture combined lifting and thrusting manipulation to improve the curative effect of CSA is better, especially for improving vertigo symptoms.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:

温馨提示

关闭