Objective Using Bayesian mesh Meta analysis method to compare the curative effect of filiform needle, traction, warm needle, electroacupuncture, water acupuncture, and fire acupuncture. Methods Search PubMed, The Cochrane Library and CNKI, VIP, WANFANG and China Biological Full-text Database. The search time is from the establishment of the database to 2020-1-1. Two researchers independently screened the literature and extracted data according to the set criteria, and used stata 16.0 and ADDIS 16.7 software for data analysis. Results A total of 34 RCTS/CCTS involving 2667 patients were included, involving 6 intervention measures of filiform needle, traction needle, warm needle, electroacupuncture needle, water needle and fire needle. The results are as follows: ① In terms of efficiency, the warm needle, fire needle, water needle, and electric acupuncture are better than the mill needle and traction. However, the difference between warm needle, fire needle, water needle and electric needle is not statistically significant. The order from superior to inferior is fire needle> warm needle> water needle> electric needle> mill needle> traction. ② In terms of visual analogy score, only warm acupuncture and water acupuncture are better than traction, and warm acupuncture is better than milli-needle. Other comparisons are not statistically significant. The order from good to bad is fire needle> warm needle> water needle> electric needle> mill needle> traction. Conclusion Fire needling and warm needling have the best curative effect in the treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy, and warm needling has the best effect in relieving pain in patients, but more high-quality literature still needs to be further confirmed.