耳穴贴压法和耳穴揿针治疗大学生焦虑性失眠的疗效对比研究
作者:
作者单位:

(1. 大理护理职业学院,云南 大理 671000;2. 大理大学,云南 大理 671000;3. 云南中医药大学,云南 昆明 650500;4. 滇西应用技术大学,云南 大理 671000)

作者简介:

杨泽冠(1992-),女,讲师,E-mail: 1538042137@qq.com

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

基金项目: 云南省教育厅科学研究基金项目(2024J1819)


Comparison of the Efficacy of Aconite Ear-Seeding and Ear-Shooting on College Students with Anxiety Insomnia
Author:
Affiliation:

(1. Dali Vocational College of Nursing, Dali 671000, China; 2. Dali University, Dali 671000, China; 3. Yunnan University of Chinese Medicine, Kunming 650500, China;4. Dianxi University of Applied Technology, Dali 671000, China)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
    摘要:

    目的 观察耳穴贴压法、耳穴揿针、假耳穴贴压对大学生焦虑性失眠的疗效比。方法 选取大理州某高职院校罹患焦虑性失眠在校大学生150例。随机分为3组:耳穴贴压组(王不留行籽)50例、耳穴揿针组50例、假耳穴贴组50例。比较3组治疗后的匹兹堡睡眠质量指数评分(Pittsburgh sleep quality index,PSQI)、汉密尔顿焦虑量表(Hamilton anxiety scale,HAMA)。结果 治疗后3组匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)和汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)评分均下降(P<0.05),其中耳穴揿针组PSQI评分[4.5(2.75,7.0)]显著优于耳穴贴压组[5.5(3,8.25)]和假耳穴组(8 ± 3.356),P<0.05。HAMA评分显示耳穴揿针组[5.5(2.0,9.25)]显著优于假耳穴组(P<0.05),但与耳穴贴压组差异无统计学意义。治疗有效率耳穴揿针组(88%)显著高于耳穴贴压组(70%)和假耳穴组(38%)(均P<0.05)。危险因素分析表明年龄、独生子女、单亲家庭、抽烟、饮酒及营养状况是焦虑性失眠的重要危险因素(P<0.05)。结论 3种干预均可改善睡眠与焦虑,但耳穴揿针疗效最优,且特定生活习惯与家庭结构因素显著影响疾病发生。

    Abstract:

    Objective To observe the efficacy of auricular pressure, auricular acupressure, and shamuricular acupressure in treating anxiety-related insomnia in college students. Methods A total of 150 college students with anxiety-related insomnia from a higher vocational institution in Dali State were recruited. The participants were divided into three groups using a randomized computerized method: the auricular pressure group(Wang bu liu xing seeds) with 50 cases, the auricular acupressure group with 50 cases, and the sham auricular acupressure group with 50 cases. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index(PSQI) and Hamilton Anxiety Scale(HAMA) scores were compared among the three groups after treatment. Results After treatment, the PSQI and HAMA scores of all three groups decreased(P<0.05), with the auricular acupressure group [4.5(2.75, 7.0 ) showing significantly better PSQI scores than the auricular pressure group [5.5(3, 8.25)] and the sham auricular [8 ± 3.356] (P<0.05). The HAMA scores showed that the auricular acupressure [5.5(2.0, 9.25)] was significantly better than the sham auricular group (P<0.05), but there was no statistically significant difference compared to the auricular pressure group. The treatment effective rate of the auricular acupressure group (8%) was significantly higher than that of the auricular pressure group (70%) and the sham auricular group (38%) (P<0.05). The analysis of risk factors indicated that being an only child, single-parent family, smoking and drinking, and nutritional status were significant risk factors anxiety-related insomnia(P<0.05). Conclusion All three interventions can improve sleep and anxiety, but auricular acuressure is the most effective, and specific lifestyle and family structure factors significantly affect the occurrence of the disease.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-03-13
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-04-16
  • 出版日期:

温馨提示

关闭